Wednesday, 4 March 2026

The Last Judgment / 最後の審判 / Saigo no shinpan (1965)

Obscure Japanese Film #250

Tatsuya Nakadai

Masao Mishima


Jiro (Tatsuya Nakadai), the manager of a pool hall owned by Asai (Masao Mishima), has been having an affair with Masako (Chikage Awashima) since her wealthy engineer husband went to oversee a construction project in Vietnam two years earlier. The husband in question, Riichiro (Fujio Suga), also happens to be Jiro’s cousin. When he returns from abroad, it becomes very difficult for the lovers to continue meeting, especially as Riichiro is not only a jealous and suspicious type, but has a short fuse to boot.


Fujio Suga

Jitsuko Yoshimura


Meanwhile, Asai wants to sell the pool hall and Jiro wants to buy it but lacks the funds. He also has little time to find them as the local yakuza want to buy the place, but then he thinks of a clever solution to his problems. This will involve both seducing a waitress, Miyoko (Onibaba’s Jitsuko Yoshimura), and getting Riichiro to use his explosive temper against himself. But will Jiro be able to stay one step ahead of dogged police detective Kikuchi? (This latter is played by Junzaburo Ban, who played a similar character in the same year’s A Fugitive from the Past.)


Junzaburo Ban


This Toho production was based on the 1949 novel Heaven Ran Last by William P. McGivern (1918-82), who also wrote the novels on which Fritz Lang’s The Big Heat (1953) and Robert Wise’s Odds Against Tomorrow (1959) were based. Heaven Ran Last, though, was never filmed by Hollywood and, like Kurosawa basing High and Low (1963) on Ed McBain’s novel King’s Ransom, it’s an indication of how much American pulp was being translated into Japanese in the post-war years that it came to the attention of director Hiromichi Horikawa. In this case, apart from transferring the story from America to Japan, screenwriters Zenzo Matsuyama and Ichiro Ikeda have stuck pretty closely to the book – too closely, perhaps, according to some Japanese reviewers who have commented that the characters don’t behave like Japanese people. In any case, I found it to be one of the better plots I’ve seen in this type of film as the twists don’t become too far-fetched, as is so often the case.


Chikage Awashima


Several of the same talents from Horikawa’s excellent 1963 noir Shiro to kuro (‘White and Black’, aka Pressure of Guilt) returned for this one, including Japan’s top film composer Toru Takemitsu as well as cast members Chikage Awashima, Masao Mishima, Eijiro Tono and, of course, star Tatsuya Nakadai. The Last Judgment makes an excellent vehicle for Nakadai, who looks very cool driving around in an MG Roadster in his shades and fur-lined jacket and is obviously having a field day being very bad indeed. However, Jiro is saved from becoming a one-dimensional villain not only by Nakadai’s charismatic performance but the fact that his love for Masako, at least, does seem to be genuine.




One of the great things about Takemitsu as a composer was that he knew when to shut up, an all-too-rare talent which is well in evidence here, while Horikawa makes excellent use of industrial noises to heighten the tension in a number of scenes. Another plus is the dark, shadowy cinematography of Tokuzo Kuroda. All in all, The Last Judgment is a very satisfying noir that has been kept in the dark for far too long.




Thanks to A.K.

If you enjoy this blog, feel free to Buy Me a Coffee!





2 comments:

  1. A bit ambivalent about that one myself, somehow i wasn't really thrilled eventually. I'm sure it would grow more on me more if a better copy surfaced, as certain shots are undeniably noir bliss.

    My very initial thoughts while watching it was that this is certainly to play better on a male audience nowadays - and no, i'm certainly not implying the film should have more...ahem, 'inclusivity' to fit today's whatever 'standards'. Maybe to frame it in a different manner first...

    It's quite interesting (maybe even indicative probably), when you say above that Japanese reviewers say that the characters don’t behave like Japanese people. One question would likely be... current day reviewers or reviewers back then? Because to me, and regardless what Japanese people say or said back then...from today's view...the whole affair... didn't even really felt 'the 60s' in the first place - let alone mid-60s. All in all, I'm very inclined to agree with the... "stuck pretty closely to the book – too closely, perhaps". I had the constant feeling this was at least 10yrs earlier... at best maybe late 50s. A feeling that one doesn't get (nowadays, to clarify) when watching eg. Odds Against Tomorrow, and obviously not High & Low...those feel entirely set exactly in the era (or maybe even year) made.

    Horikawa's own previous Pressure Of Guilt 2 yrs earlier also doesn't seem to suffer from such. If one was to take it further, in more...far out there and... semi-perverse 'comparisons', just think eg. what Melville was doing roughly in the same yrs with pulp-alike material: Samurai, merely 2 yrs later on, and regardless of whether one adores it, gets bored to death by it, or feels for it somewhere in the middle...is certainly miles & miles ahead when it comes to transposing identities from different eras & cultures, and yet still remains no questions asked entirely confined within the spell of the classic oldschool male-centric pulp mythology...

    Had this been made in the mid or late 50s, i'd have a much, much more positive view & i'd have warmed up more to it. Guess what i'm trying to say is that by not being male, surely i find it harder to 'identify' with pulp & noir every now or then... as i usually also need other bits & pieces aside from the 'core & well-worn myth' to hold onto. For the most part, such are surrounding elements that reflect and/or express the era such was made: how was the 'myth' re-interpreted then, there & why? But here?... It's like it possesses a certain abstracted quality: the myth-as-it-is, served raw & almost naked... close to being a dry earlier prototype. There's minimal effort to further connect somehow with it's era historically, or to at least toy around with the idea of bending some rules of the genre formally. There's nothing to further the boundaries of myth or re-interpret it if you will - it's just 'replicated'... the way we already know and like it. 1965 though was not...1949, something more was needed here in this or that department than just an excellent technical execution.

    All in all, i was way far more satisfied overall eg. with Pressure Of Guilt from Horikawa. Another film that also somehow came to mind while watching (say as a then 'modern' variation of...doom & gloom), was Suzuki's Structure Of Hate...Still, if a better copy surfaced, i'd certainly give it a re-watch down the road...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your thoughts Alice! The Japanese reviews I made reference to were recent online ones.

      Delete